Satisfaction with NetCAT 6.5 program


Total respondents: 41 NetCAT 6.5 participants
Duration: November 6th - November 15th, 2008 (10 days)
1. How did you like NetCAT program in general ?
Perfect idea 31 76 %
Good 10 24 %
Don't know 0 0 %
Useless activity 0 0 %
Very bad 0 0 %

2. Do you think that voting for bugs was useful ?
Yes 36 88 %
No 5 12 %

3. How are you satisfied with fixing NetCAT bugs during stabilization phase ?
Very satisfied 11 27 %
Satisfied 26 63 %
Don't know 3 7 %
Discontented 1 2 %
Very discontented 0 0 %

4. How would you classify the traffic on the [65cat] mailing list ?
Heavy 12 29 %
Medium 28 68 %
Low 1 2 %

5. How do you value work of NetCAT coordinator, Jiri Kovalsky ?
Very satisfied 38 93 %
Satisfied 3 7 %
Don't know 0 0 %
Discontented 0 0 %
Very discontented 0 0 %

6. Would you be willing to participate in NetCAT program again ?
Yes 41 100 %
No 0 0 %

7. How do you value cooperation with NetBeans Developers and QE ?
Responsive and helpful 34 83 %
Mostly responsive but not really helpful 4 10 %
Don't know 2 5 %
Non responsive 1 2 %
Completely ignoring my work 0 0 %

8. What communication channel does suit your needs better ?
Mailing list 34 83 %
Web forum 16 39 %
On-line chat 8 20 %
Others 1 2 %

9. Do you have any suggestions for NetCAT program to be more successful ?
Extracted summary of answers:

  • Start the program earlier.
  • Implement automatic updating of CAT points or get rid of it completely.
  • Better traceability of bugs vs. builds where these were fixed.
  • Invite advanced users of other IDEs to compare functionalities and help us improve NetBeans.
  • Improve voting for bugs. It has an awkward form and never seemed to have any effect.

Project Features

About this Project

QA was started in November 2009, is owned by Jiří Kovalský, and has 97 members.
By use of this website, you agree to the NetBeans Policies and Terms of Use (revision 20160708.bf2ac18). © 2014, Oracle Corporation and/or its affiliates. Sponsored by Oracle logo
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close