Satisfaction with NetCAT 6.0 program

1. How did you like NetCAT program in general ?
Perfect idea 36 82 %
Good 8 18 %
Don't know 0 0 %
Useless activity 0 0 %
Very bad 0 0 %

2. Do you think that voting for bugs was useful ?
Yes 37 84 %
No 7 16 %

3. How are you satisfied with fixing NetCAT bugs during stabilization phase ?
Very satisfied 14 32 %
Satisfied 29 66 %
Don't know 0 0 %
Discontented 1 2 %
Very discontented 0 0 %

4. How would you classify the traffic on the [60cat] mailing list ?
Heavy 10 23 %
Medium 34 77 %
Low 0 0 %

5. How do you value work of NetCAT coordinator, Jiri Kovalsky ?
Very satisfied 36 82 %
Satisfied 8 18 %
Don't know 0 0 %
Discontented 0 0 %
Very discontented 0 0 %

6. Would you be willing to participate in NetCAT program again ?
Yes 44 100 %
No 0 0 %

7. How do you value cooperation with NetBeans Developers and QE ?
Responsive anf helpful 39 89 %
Mostly responsive but not really helpful 5 11 %
Non responsive 0 0 %
Completely ignoring my work 0 0 %

8. What communication channel does suit your needs better ?
Mailing list 37 84 %
Web forum 13 30 %
On-line chat 7 16 %
Others 4 9 %

9. Do you have any suggestions for NetCAT program to be more successful ?
Extracted summary of answers:

  • Fix login problems in the bug submission form.
  • Keep a list of top 10 NetCAT bugs through the program.
  • Use online chats for tough topic discussions or if fast response is needed.
  • Implement automatic updating of CAT points.
  • Do not count idle messages ("Thanks.", "I voted" etc.)
  • Introduce web forums.

Project Features

About this Project

QA was started in November 2009, is owned by Jiří Kovalský, and has 97 members.
By use of this website, you agree to the NetBeans Policies and Terms of Use (revision 20160708.bf2ac18). © 2014, Oracle Corporation and/or its affiliates. Sponsored by Oracle logo
 
 
Close
loading
Please Confirm
Close