FeaturesPluginsDocs & SupportCommunityPartners

Satisfaction with NetCAT 6.0 program

1. How did you like NetCAT program in general ?
Perfect idea 36 82 %
Good 8 18 %
Don't know 0 0 %
Useless activity 0 0 %
Very bad 0 0 %

2. Do you think that voting for bugs was useful ?
Yes 37 84 %
No 7 16 %

3. How are you satisfied with fixing NetCAT bugs during stabilization phase ?
Very satisfied 14 32 %
Satisfied 29 66 %
Don't know 0 0 %
Discontented 1 2 %
Very discontented 0 0 %

4. How would you classify the traffic on the [60cat] mailing list ?
Heavy 10 23 %
Medium 34 77 %
Low 0 0 %

5. How do you value work of NetCAT coordinator, Jiri Kovalsky ?
Very satisfied 36 82 %
Satisfied 8 18 %
Don't know 0 0 %
Discontented 0 0 %
Very discontented 0 0 %

6. Would you be willing to participate in NetCAT program again ?
Yes 44 100 %
No 0 0 %

7. How do you value cooperation with NetBeans Developers and QE ?
Responsive anf helpful 39 89 %
Mostly responsive but not really helpful 5 11 %
Non responsive 0 0 %
Completely ignoring my work 0 0 %

8. What communication channel does suit your needs better ?
Mailing list 37 84 %
Web forum 13 30 %
On-line chat 7 16 %
Others 4 9 %

9. Do you have any suggestions for NetCAT program to be more successful ?
Extracted summary of answers:

  • Fix login problems in the bug submission form.
  • Keep a list of top 10 NetCAT bugs through the program.
  • Use online chats for tough topic discussions or if fast response is needed.
  • Implement automatic updating of CAT points.
  • Do not count idle messages ("Thanks.", "I voted" etc.)
  • Introduce web forums.
Companion
Projects:
MySQL Database Server   Open JDK: an Open SourceJDK   GlassFish Community: an Open Source Application Server    Mobile & Embedded Community    Open Solaris   java.net - The Source for Java Technology Collaboration   Virtual Box - full virtualizer  Open ESB - The Open Enterprise Service Bus Powered by