Satisfaction with NetCAT 5.5 program
1. How did you like NetCAT program in general ?
| Perfect idea |
10 |
56 % |
| Good |
7 |
38 % |
| Don't know |
1 |
6 % |
| Useless activity |
0 |
0 % |
| Very bad |
0 |
0 % |
|
|
|
2. Do you think that voting for bugs was useful ?
|
|
3. How are you satisfied with fixing NetCAT bugs during stabilization phase ?
| Very satisfied |
2 |
11 % |
| Satisfied |
15 |
83 % |
| Don't know |
1 |
6 % |
| Discontented |
0 |
0 % |
| Very discontented |
0 |
0 % |
|
|
4. How would you classify the traffic on the [nbj2ee] mailing list ?
| Heavy |
3 |
17 % |
| Medium |
13 |
72 % |
| Low |
2 |
11 % |
|
|
5. How do you value work of NetCAT coordinator, Jiri Kovalsky ?
| Very satisfied |
15 |
83 % |
| Satisfied |
2 |
11 % |
| Don't know |
1 |
6 % |
| Discontented |
0 |
0 % |
| Very discontented |
0 |
0 % |
|
|
|
6. Would you be willing to participate in NetCAT program again ?
|
|
7. How do you value cooperation with NetBeans Developers and QE ?
| Responsive anf helpful |
16 |
89 % |
| Mostly responsive but not really helpful |
2 |
11 % |
| Non responsive |
0 |
0 % |
| Completely ignoring my work |
0 |
0 % |
|
|
8. What communication channel does suit your needs better ?
| Mailing list |
16 |
89 % |
| Web forum |
5 |
28 % |
| On-line chat |
2 |
11 % |
| Others |
2 |
11 % |
|
|
9. Do you have any suggestions for NetCAT program to be more successful ?
Extracted summary of answers:
- I just feel that NetCAT 5.5 was a bit cold.
- Distribute new features among NetCAT participants so that everything is equally tested.
- If you implement a white board it would be a great thing.
- Having a RSS feed showing last bug fixes would avoid LOTs of "change log" reading.
