Satisfaction with NetCAT 5.0 program
1. How did you like NetCAT program in general ?
| Perfect idea |
35 |
53 % |
| Good |
31 |
47 % |
| Don't know |
0 |
0 % |
| Useless activity |
0 |
0 % |
| Very bad |
0 |
0 % |
|
|
|
2. Do you think that voting for bugs was useful ?
|
|
3. How are you satisfied with fixing NetCAT bugs during stabilization phase ?
| Very satisfied |
11 |
17 % |
| Satisfied |
48 |
73 % |
| Don't know |
4 |
6 % |
| Discontented |
3 |
4 % |
| Very discontented |
0 |
0 % |
|
|
4. How would you classify the traffic on the [50cat] mailing list ?
| Heavy |
32 |
48 % |
| Medium |
32 |
48 % |
| Low |
2 |
4 % |
|
|
5. How do you value work of NetCAT coordinator, Jiri Kovalsky ?
| Very satisfied |
57 |
86 % |
| Satisfied |
8 |
12 % |
| Don't know |
1 |
2 % |
| Discontented |
0 |
0 % |
| Very discontented |
0 |
0 % |
|
|
|
6. Would you be willing to participate in NetCAT program again ?
|
|
7. How do you value cooperation with NetBeans Developers and QE ?
| Responsive anf helpful |
52 |
79 % |
| Mostly responsive but not really helpful |
13 |
19 % |
| Non responsive |
0 |
0 % |
| Completely ignoring my work |
1 |
2 % |
|
|
|
8. Did you like collecting NetCAT points contest ?
|
|
9. What communication channel does suit your needs better ?
| Mailing list |
51 |
77 % |
| Web forum |
27 |
41 % |
| On-line chat |
13 |
20 % |
| Others |
3 |
5 % |
|
|
10. Do you have any suggestions for NetCAT program to be more successful ?
Extracted summary of answers:
- Create "list of substitutes" and replace non active participants after 2 weeks of inactivity
- Introduce kind of "Pre-NetCAT" program focusing on new features design and usability verification
- Give up collecting NetCAT points or at least don't count messages to decrease artificial traffic
- Improve web, searching for duplicates, fasten IssueZilla
- Devide NetCAT team into subgroups with own mailing lists responsible for particular areas
